Re: Who want's a title?

by **Rin Shimada** Sat Oct 10, 2009 1:13 pm

...However, it doesn't necessarily mean that the living must prove the vastness of the universe, so as to say that time has no bounds at all, even if there will came a time that every living and non-living will cease to exist.

by **Kyon** Sat Oct 10, 2009 5:03 pm

....hmmmm

time is only a human term of measure , the question "how long has it been, will it take and etc"

ok

lets say that for example Ghosts are real "just an example"
and some people saw it and spread the word
but the people that these people spoken to didn't believe their story and demanded proof to believe

in this scenario there are two main questions to be asked in a 3rd person perspective "well it must be related to there existence"
THE QUESTIONS :
who are the ones who will believe

and

what is it that they are going to believe

Please make a conclusion with this elements "I just want to see who are on the same page of the same book with me probably none but still wanna try ^^"

by **Basil** Tue Oct 13, 2009 8:05 pm

But in comes the concept of the argumentum ad populum. It denotes the fallacy of popular belief against scientific evidence that proves otherwise.

Besides, we humans are still moronic cretins with regards to grasping the vastness of the universe. Our ancestors have connected various scientific phenomena to idols and gods, deities that do not exist.